A U.S. general has raised concerns regarding the scale and complexities of a potential military operation against Iran. Sources indicate that he is apprehensive about the possible losses the U.S. may incur should such a mission unfold. These concerns come in stark contrast to the optimistic tone from the White House, where President Donald Trump has portrayed an easy victory for the U.S. military, although the exact nature of success has not been clearly defined.

President Trump has called on General Keane to develop a broad array of military plans directed at Iran. These plans may encompass a range of actions, from attacks on Iran's ballistic missile infrastructure and nuclear facilities to targeting senior leaders in an attempt to effect regime change. In private meetings, the general has been reported to express his worries more directly but adopts a reserved approach in Trump's presence, attempting to avoid direct confrontation while still maintaining a professional military leadership style.

As the general serves as Trump's principal military advisor, he is tasked with balancing his own caution with the president's aggressive stance. The situation depicts a delicate dynamic in military advisory circles, where policy decisions regarding Iran could not only impact U.S. military strategy but also international relations across the Middle East. The ongoing discussions reflect a continued concern about Iran’s missile capabilities and its potential impacts on regional security.