The article highlights the pressing challenges facing peace operations today in light of a significant critique of multilateralism. With the international architecture established post-World War II now struggling against insurmountable difficulties, the question arises regarding who can effectively impose peace when the systems intended to do so begin to falter. The United Nations (UN), once a pillar for peace and cooperation, is likened by some analysts to the League of Nations in the pre-World War II period, as it grapples with overextension, bureaucratic paralysis due to the veto power, and increasingly complex missions with dwindling resources.

The current state of the UN reflects a critical scenario wherein its role within the international community is under intense scrutiny. The contrast between the ambitious aims set forth in its founding and the reality of its functioning today prompts a discussion about the need for reform and revitalization of its mandates. As these peace operations become more intricate, they call for innovative solutions and collaborative efforts among member states, highlighting the challenges that accompany the pursuit of peace in turbulent times.

Moreover, the call for a reinvigorated leadership from the UN Secretary-General, particularly a figure supported by the most influential states, underscores the urgency for a unified approach to international peace and security. The article posits that addressing these systemic issues is crucial not only for the future effectiveness of global peace operations but also for restoring faith in the multilateralism that underpins international relations.