In a recent commentary, Professor Massimo Cacciari discussed the significance of the upcoming referendum on justice in Italy. He emphasized that the referendum is not about the stability of the government or meaningful reform of the judicial system; rather, it reflects a troubling trend where judges become subordinate to executive power. Cacciari aimed to clarify misconceptions about the referendum, asserting that the real critical issues affecting citizens, such as expedited trials and humane treatment within the penitentiary system, are not being addressed by this vote.

Cacciari critiques the perception that the referendum will result in tangible improvements to judicial processes, arguing instead that the proposed changes risk undermining judicial independence. He notes that public discourse surrounding the referendum has misfocused on political power dynamics rather than on the implications for justice and legal integrity in Italy. His position reflects a broader concern within Italian society regarding the potential erosion of judicial powers and the consequent impact on rule of law.

The professor’s call to vote against the referendum resonates with many who fear that undermining judicial autonomy could lead to increased political interference in judicial matters. As debates intensify, the discourse around this referendum is critical, shaping not just the immediate political landscape, but also the future of judicial accountability and civil rights in Italy.