In this opinion piece by Fiona Katauskas, the author reflects on the contentious political career of Pauline Hanson, the leader of One Nation, a party known for its controversial and often divisive views on immigration and national identity in Australia. The article suggests that Hanson's political narrative often revolves around finding groups to blame for societal issues, a pattern that resonates with certain segments of the Australian electorate. Through her rise to prominence in the late 1990s and her continued influence, Hanson has exemplified how populist rhetoric can leverage fear and resentment to gain political traction.

Katauskas argues that examining Hanson's past actions offers valuable insights into current political dynamics, especially regarding how fear can be weaponized in political discourse. By underscoring the importance of scrutinizing the roots of this divisiveness, the piece calls for a deeper understanding of the social and political implications of Hanson's ideologies. The author implies that, while Hanson has faced significant opposition, her persistence highlights an enduring appeal among voters who feel disillusioned with mainstream politics.

The commentary serves as both a critique and a cautionary tale, inviting readers to consider the broader impacts of Hanson's political strategies on Australian society. It underscores the necessity for vigilance against similar tactics that may appear in contemporary political landscapes, suggesting that history has much to teach us about the potential consequences of populist approaches that exploit societal fears for electoral gain.