Feb 25 β€’ 22:11 UTC πŸ‡±πŸ‡Ή Lithuania 15min

Navalny died because of lithium use, and other absurd versions: how the Kremlin justifies the murder of a political opponent?

The article discusses the circumstances surrounding the death of Alexei Navalny, highlighting claims of poisoning and different narratives provided by the Kremlin and international officials.

In a press conference during the Munich Security Conference on the second anniversary of Alexei Navalny's death, his widow, Yulia Navalnaya, revealed that foreign ministers from four countries, including the UK, Sweden, France, Germany, and the Netherlands, have stated that they believe Navalny was poisoned by a lethal toxin. The joint statement indicated that these conclusions come from analyzing samples of his body tissues, pointing to a coordinated stance among Western nations regarding the circumstances of the Russian opposition leader's demise.

Reports indicate that Navalny died in prison after being poisoned by a toxin commonly found in Ecuadorian tree frogs, specifically epibatidine. This revelation has raised serious concerns about the conditions surrounding his treatment and the integrity of allegations made by Russian authorities that he died from natural causes. Given the toxicity of epibatidine and the reported symptoms leading up to Navalny's death, skepticism towards the Russian government's narrative continues to grow.

The implications of this situation are profound, not only for Russian politics but also for international relations. The perception that Navalny's death could be a politically motivated act has led to increased tensions between Russia and the West. As more evidence surfaces, it raises critical questions about the safety of political dissidents in Russia and the willingness of the international community to act in response to human rights violations.

πŸ“‘ Similar Coverage