Feb 25 β€’ 21:00 UTC πŸ‡±πŸ‡Ή Lithuania 15min

Four years of terror: three versions of why the USA believed Russia's desire to end the war in Ukraine

The article discusses former US President Joe Biden's military support for Ukraine and the critiques of its effectiveness amidst changes in US policy expected with potential future leadership.

This article analyzes the evolving dynamics of US support for Ukraine under former President Joe Biden, highlighting the substantial military aid provided to Ukraine and the promise to support it indefinitely. However, Biden faced criticism for not supplying weapons that would decisively shift the balance toward a Ukrainian victory, suggesting that the assistance was more about survival than success. The reluctance to provide long-range missiles is particularly noteworthy, as this decision was delayed until a potential shift in Biden’s position following the 2024 elections became apparent.

The article also emphasizes Biden's approach to diplomacy, which involved avoiding direct engagement with Russian President Vladimir Putin, reflecting a shared belief among US and European leaders that Putin had no genuine interest in resolving the conflict. This strategic stance underscores a broader hesitance within the Biden administration to explore diplomatic channels, focusing instead on military aid as a primary means of support for Ukraine.

Looking ahead, the article speculates on the potential implications of Donald Trump resuming the presidency in January 2025, suggesting that this could lead to a dramatic shift in US foreign policy towards Ukraine and its confrontation with Russia. The analysis raises concerns about how this political change might affect the ongoing war in Ukraine and the international community's response to an evolving geopolitical landscape.

πŸ“‘ Similar Coverage