In the Paris trial of Claude Muhayimana, who is accused of complicity in the Rwandan genocide, testimonies from civil parties were presented, marking a crucial phase in the proceedings. Muhayimana, a Franco-Rwandan former driver, faces allegations of having transported interahamwe militia to sites of mass killings. Despite being sentenced to 14 years in prison by a lower court, he maintains his innocence and has appealed the verdict.

Over the course of the trial, which has lasted nearly four weeks, a variety of witnesses, historians, and genocide survivors provided their accounts, with some testifying directly from Kigali. However, Muhayimana has repeatedly asserted that the testimonies against him are fabricated and has described the witnesses as liars, a stance his defense claims reflects a "conspiratorial" mindset. The complexities of the case are compounded by the emotional weight of the witnesses, who represent the victims of one of the most horrific events of the 20th century.

Before the civil parties made their pleas, expert testimonies from a psychologist and a psychoanalyst portrayed Muhayimana as a "perfectly normal" individual, adding another layer to the narrative surrounding his character and mental state. This perspective might create a challenging discourse regarding the nature of guilt and innocence, as the legal proceedings unfold amid a backdrop of historical trauma and collective memory of the genocide.