The Council of the Magistracy in Argentina has announced that it will expand its investigation into the federal judge of Rosario, Gastón Salmain, who has been accused of issuing rulings in exchange for bribes. In a recent session, the Accusation Committee resolved to request additional evidence from federal justice as part of efforts to clarify the charges against Salmain, which have already put him in a precarious position. This investigation highlights ongoing concerns about judicial corruption in Argentina, especially the alleged practices surrounding certain judges that undermine public trust in the legal system.

In the same meeting, the commission also delayed making a decision regarding a separate case involving federal judge Alberto López of Mar del Plata. López has faced accusations of disseminating antisemitic comments on social media, which has prompted backlash and calls for disciplinary action. The decision was postponed despite having been on the agenda, due to concerns raised by MP Rodolfo Tailhade about whether the appropriate response should be formal sanctions or a direct push for impeachment. This highlights the complexity of addressing allegations of misconduct within the judiciary in Argentina, where political implications can complicate a straightforward approach.

The cases of Salmain and López have been fueled by serious allegations made by organizations such as the Argentine Forum against Antisemitism (FACA) and the Delegation of Argentine Israeli Associations (DAIA). Their involvement underscores the critical role that civil society organizations play in challenging judicial malfeasance and advocating for judicial integrity. The outcomes of these investigations could have significant ramifications for the judges involved and may pave the way for broader reforms in Argentina's judicial oversight mechanisms, especially in light of ongoing debates about judicial accountability and transparency.