CNN: Key documents relating to the Epstein case have disappeared. They involve Donald Trump
Key documents from the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, including critical witness interviews accusing Donald Trump of sexual assault, have reportedly gone missing, as highlighted by CNN.
According to CNN, several key witness interviews from the FBI's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein have disappeared from a recently released collection of documents by the Department of Justice. Among the lost documents are three interviews with a woman who has accused President Donald Trump of sexual assault in the 1980s. In her testimony, she also claimed that Epstein had abused her multiple times starting when she was just 13 years old. The omission of these interviews raises serious questions about the completeness of the evidence available in ongoing investigations involving high-profile individuals.
The evidence register shared with the lawyers of Epstein's associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, reportedly includes reference numbers for approximately 325 witness interrogation records from the FBI. However, more than 90 of these records, accounting for over a quarter of the list, are currently unavailable on the Department of Justice's website. This significant gap in the documentation has prompted scrutiny, particularly from Congressman Robert Garcia, a member of the House Oversight Committee, who has expressed concerns about the implications of these missing documents, especially given the weight of the allegations made against the President.
Concerns regarding the integrity of the investigation and the accessibility of key evidence are heightened by the claim from Garcia, who stated, "One of the victims brings serious accusations against the President." This situation not only raises questions about the accountability of those involved but also highlights ongoing issues with transparency within federal investigations involving powerful political figures. As this case continues to unfold, the implications of these lost documents may influence not only public perception but also the legal landscape surrounding allegations of misconduct involving prominent individuals.