In the wake of President Donald Trump's State of the Union (SOTU) address, liberal commentators from MS NOW and CNN expressed sharp criticism of the speech's content and style. They highlighted a specific section where Trump awarded medals to various Americans, which they deemed reminiscent of a game show. Jen Psaki, a former press secretary and current host, articulated that there were multiple distinct segments within the speech, labeling one as the 'circus entertainer' part where Trump showcased unrelated individuals to evoke public interest and applause.

Critically, commentators argued that the speech was divided into three main parts: the first being filled with divisive and controversial themes, the second more performance-oriented with emotional anecdotes that strayed from substantive policy discussions, and the final portion which aimed at outlining governmental policies. Psaki's remarks suggest a broader dissatisfaction among critics regarding Trump's approach, indicating that rather than addressing pressing national issues, he opted for theatricality and sensationalism.

The implications of such a response suggest a profound divide within the American political landscape, where the delivery and style of political messages are increasingly scrutinized. Critics argue that while Trump's focus on the economy and national 'turnaround' might resonate with some supporters, the overall perception of his address could alienate centrist or undecided voters, complicating the political climate ahead of upcoming elections.