The article from Le Figaro highlights the renewed discussions on the end-of-life law in France, particularly as the bill returns to the National Assembly after being previously rejected by the Senate. This proposal is currently under review by the Social Affairs Committee, which has largely restored the initially approved version by deputies while making slight modifications. One significant change involves the removal of the clause stating that 'psychological suffering alone cannot in any case allow for assisted dying.' Instead, this amendment recognizes the validity of both 'physical or psychological' suffering, provided it is connected to a life-threatening condition.

The article points out the intense debates that have arisen from this law's reconsideration, notably with amendments being introduced to clarify the criteria for assisted dying. An amendment put forth by deputies Stéphane Peu and Soumya Bourouaha reestablishes this distinction during the public session. This illustrates the varied opinions among legislators regarding the delicate issue of assisted dying, which combines ethical, medical, and personal considerations.

With public sentiment around end-of-life decisions shifting, the article emphasizes the legislative body's responsibility to balance compassion and ethical implications in their discussions. As the assembly deliberates, the outcome of this law could significantly influence how end-of-life care is approached in France, reflecting larger societal attitudes towards autonomy and assistance in dying.