Garry Kasparov argues that the historical narrative of chess is closely intertwined with the broader history of civilization, particularly during the Soviet era when chess was utilized as a powerful ideological instrument. In his writings and interviews, Kasparov has highlighted how Lenin elevated chess from a mere pastime to a state endeavor, using it to showcase the intellectual prowess of the communist regime against a perceived moral decline of the West.

He reflects on how the Soviet Union produced countless talented chess players, emphasizing that millions of children participated in training systems where few career paths were available outside of common routes in business, politics, or law. The cultivation of chess in the USSR represented a strategic move by the government to promote a culture of intellectualism and demonstrate the state's commitment to nurturing talent in high-stakes arenas like competitive play, music, and science. Therefore, the dominance of Soviet chess was not merely a product of skill but rather a result of systemic support for the sport as part of an ideological mission.

As the narrative of chess continues to evolve, especially with the decline of Russian chess influence in recent times, there is a significant reflection on the changing cultural landscape. It raises questions about the future of chess as both a competitive endeavor and a cultural artifact that carries the weight of political history. Following Kasparov’s insights, the implications of this shift indicate not only a loss of a once-dominant chess strategy but also a redefinition of how countries perceive and engage with chess as part of their national identity.