In a heated session of Prime Minister's Questions (PMQs), Labour leader Keir Starmer aimed his criticism at Nigel Farage, stating that Farage's lack of condemnation towards comments made by a Reform council chief, Simon Evans, was unacceptable. Evans had shared a post suggesting that MP Natalie Fleet should 'be shot', which Starmer highlighted as a severe and irresponsible statement. He emphasized that this was not merely a casual remark but a dangerously incendiary comment that undermines the safety and respect that MPs deserve.

Starmer pointed out that Evans's post misattributed a quote to Fleet regarding a grooming gang enquiry, which is particularly sensitive given Fleet’s personal history of being groomed and raped as a teenager. The remark was not only a direct attack but also a distortion of Fleet’s stance on a critical issue, further politicizing a traumatic experience. Evans later apologized and deleted the post, but Starmer argued this was insufficient given the severity of the comments.

The exchange raised important questions about political rhetoric and the responsibility of leaders to address extreme views within their ranks. Starmer's challenge to Farage serves as a broader call for accountability in political discourse, showcasing how language and expressions of dissent can escalate into dangerous territory. Critics are calling for a comprehensive approach to ensure politicians are held to a standard that prioritizes the safety and well-being of all public figures, particularly those facing personal attacks because of their beliefs and history.