The article comments on the recent decision by the Bundeswehr to proceed with the procurement of kamikaze drones at a cost of 540 million euros, a move that has raised eyebrows among observers of military spending. The drones, which are being ordered for the first time, have not been tested in combat, leading to skepticism about their reliability, particularly given past instances where similar drones have malfunctioned during tests. The lack of combat experience raises concerns about their accuracy and effectiveness in real-world scenarios.

In a critical analysis, the author highlights the significance of parliamentary oversight in defense expenditures. The Bundestag has approved only a portion of the budget for this project, reserving the possibility of further funding based on the outcomes of future evaluations and performances of the drones. This cautious approach suggests that while there is a commitment to expanding military capabilities, there is also a recognition of the need for accountability and rigorous assessment of military purchases.

Overall, the article raises pertinent questions about the military procurement process in Germany, emphasizing that while innovation and modernization are essential, they must be balanced with proven effectiveness and oversight to ensure taxpayer money is spent wisely. The commentary underscores the complexity of arms procurement in a rapidly evolving military landscape, where untested technology must be approached with caution and strategic foresight.