The article addresses the phenomenon of Latvia's 'blacklist', a list frequently mentioned in local media that includes individuals, particularly Russian celebrities and politicians, who are barred from entering the country. The recent focus is on historian Andrei Lankov's expulsion, although official confirmation of the reasons for his deportation is still awaited from Latvian authorities. This exclusion reflects broader geopolitical tensions and Latvia's ongoing scrutiny of Russian influence within its borders.

The piece delves into how individuals are added to this 'blacklist', encompassing a variety of methods, including government decisions motivated by security concerns and international relations. With mentioned cases of both known public figures and their actions leading to exclusion, the article highlights the complexity surrounding the criteria and the decision-making process involved. Furthermore, it raises questions about accountability and transparency in how individuals are deemed a threat to national interests.

Additionally, the article discusses the implications of being placed on this blacklist, including the challenges individuals face in trying to appeal or remove their names from such a list. It suggests that while some may be able to challenge their status, the overall process appears opaque, posing difficulty for those wishing to understand or contest their exclusion. This situation opens up discussions on civil liberties, national security, and the balance between protecting the state and upholding individual rights.