During a recent court appearance in the Audiencia Nacional, the chief investigator of the case against the Pujol family, a prominent political dynasty in Catalonia, admitted to feelings of "personal animosity" towards them. This animosity originated from his earlier indictment, requested by the Pujol family, for allegedly introducing illegally obtained banking data into the judicial investigation. Although he was ultimately cleared of all charges and did not stand trial, the resentment has lingered, casting a shadow over the credibility of the investigation.

Furthermore, the investigator dismissed the notion that the hidden wealth of the Pujol family, previously revealed in Andorra, stemmed from inheritance. He asserted that the regularization of funds that took place in 2014 was "incomplete", suggesting there are still significant undisclosed aspects regarding the family's financial dealings. This testimony raises critical questions about the thoroughness of the investigation and transparency surrounding the family's financial history.

Overall, the admission of personal feelings by the investigator has sparked debates regarding the objectivity and integrity of the legal proceedings. The case not only implicates issues of corruption and misuse of power but also raises the stakes for the Spanish judiciary as it seeks to maintain credibility in high-profile cases involving influential political figures. The perceptions of bias could affect future rulings and public trust in the judicial system as a whole.