The article discusses the political landscape in Saxony-Anhalt, Germany, highlighting that the so-called consensus democracy is more of a 'thin democracy' in reality. It critiques the government's approach to countering the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, implying that current legislative measures aimed at curtailing the party's influence ultimately undermine democratic principles. By enacting laws that limit the ability of a prime minister to unilaterally dissolve state contracts, the government is attempting to protect democratic institutions but is paradoxically weakening public trust in them.

The piece also mentions significant changes to the state constitutional court's judicial selection process, where previously a two-thirds majority was required to elect judges, but now a simple majority suffices. This amendment is intended to eliminate the obstruction tactics from opposition parties like the AfD but raises concerns over the potential erosion of checks and balances within the judicial system. By reducing the requirements for such critical appointments, the government may be perceived as consolidating power, which could further alienate segments of the electorate.

Ultimately, the article posits that these strategies, while aimed at fortifying democracy against extremist influences, are creating a more divided political environment and may foster cynicism among the populace regarding democratic institutions. It suggests that the fight against the AfD, rather than reinforcing democracy, is leading to a landscape where democratic values are increasingly compromised in favor of political expediency.