In Jalisco, Mexico, officials are pushing for a return to normal routines, suggesting that a return to pre-crisis life is imminent. However, this optimism sharply contrasts with the on-the-ground reality, highlighting a disconnect between governmental communications and the lived experiences of citizens. For example, on February 22, just after noon, the security cabinet posted on social media that the Jalisco airports were operating normally without any significant incidents. Yet, at that same moment, videos were circulating of the Chapala highway, a crucial access route to the airport, being blocked due to violent acts by drug traffickers.

This discrepancy raises important questions about the state's definition of 'normalcy.' The government's assurances were published while significant disruptions were clearly visible to the public, indicating either ignorance or negligence on the part of federal authorities. Such situations not only inflict immediate chaos on travel and logistics but also diminish public trust in the government's ability to ensure safety and stability. Cancelling flights and imposing restrictions serves as a stark reminder that normalcy is more than just a state of government rhetoric; it is deeply tied to the security and safety experienced by the populace on a daily basis.

The ongoing struggle between official narratives and the harsh realities faced by citizens points to a critical need for honest Communications from authorities. For any return to normalcy to be feasible, it must be predicated on authentic improvements in security and trust, rather than mere optimistic statements. As citizens continue to navigate the complexities of daily life, the promise of normality must be aligned with substantive action to ensure their safety and well-being in Jalisco and beyond.