The article from Aftenposten highlights the Norwegian Supreme Court's steadfast position on not allowing media coverage to influence criminal sentencing. Recently, the trial of Marius Borg Høiby has brought renewed discussions around whether significant media attention should warrant a reduction in sentences for high-profile cases. The court's consistent rejection of this idea emphasizes that negative media attention should not lead to lesser punishment, reinforcing the principle of equal treatment under the law regardless of public interest or celebrity status.

The court argues that reducing sentences based on media scrutiny could establish a dangerous precedent in the legal system. Such a shift could lead to a situation where more famous individuals or cases garner lighter penalties simply due to public interest, which undermines the integrity of the justice system. The article asserts that inherently unequal treatment based on media attention would compromise the equitable application of justice, suggesting that personal notoriety should not influence legal outcomes.

Overall, the Aftenposten article advocates for the maintenance of a system where justice is administered fairly, independent of media narratives. It presents the Supreme Court's longstanding position as crucial in preventing discrimination within the justice system, ensuring that all individuals receive equal treatment regardless of their social status or media presence.