The article titled 'Não é só Punch que foi abandonado' highlights the case of a monkey at the Ichikawa City Zoo in Japan that has faced abandonment, drawing parallels with historical references to a humor magazine called Punch that also saw a decline. It describes the challenging conditions that the monkey is experiencing, emphasizing the neglect and disheartening scenarios often faced by animals in captivity.

Within the broader context, the piece touches on the relationship between humans and animals, raising awareness about how some institutions fail to provide adequate care and attention to animals, leading to abandonment and distress. It also contrasts the historical significance of Punch magazine, which is synonymous with humor and satire, with the somber narrative of animal welfare issues.

This commentary serves as a reminder of the responsibilities that come with caring for sentient beings, urging readers to consider the implications of neglect in various forms, whether in the realm of journalism or animal care. The piece implicitly calls for a reconsideration of how society values and supports both cultural expressions and animal rights.