The Argentine government has opted for a strategy of silence following the announcement of a strike by the Asociación del Fútbol Argentino (AFA), led by its president Claudio 'Chiqui' Tapia. The government is aware that this strike will affect all football categories starting next week, coinciding with the date when Tapia and AFA's treasurer Pablo Toviggino are set to face judicial questioning. This decision to refrain from public confrontation is notable given the tensions surrounding the administration's relationship with the AFA.

While the government has chosen to avoid public rhetoric regarding the AFA's strike, it continues to maintain an aggressive approach in the judicial and administrative domain. Legal deadlines are paramount, with a pressing requirement for the AFA and the Super League to provide further explanations related to their affairs. This legal strategy indicates the government's intention to hold these entities accountable, even as they avoid escalating any public disputes that might further sour relations.

The implications of this silence could be significant, as it reflects a cautious approach from the government, possibly to prevent backlash from soccer fans and stakeholders. The strike stirs strong emotions among wide swathes of the Argentine public, which complicates the political landscape for the government as it dances around this contentious issue while seeking to enforce its legal agenda toward the governance of Argentine football.