The ongoing trial of the Marielle Franco case at the Supreme Court of Brazil has intensified discussions around the plea bargain testimony provided by former police officer Ronnie Lessa. In the first day of oral arguments presented on Tuesday, October 24, the Attorney General's office and the representatives of Franco's family argued for the validity of Lessa's testimony. They insisted that it should be considered as a critical piece of evidence when evaluated alongside other facts presented in the case. This highlights the importance of Lessa's statements in seeking justice for Franco, a prominent councilwoman and social justice advocate who was murdered in 2018.

In contrast, the defense team representing the accused has vehemently attacked the credibility of Lessa's testimony. They contend that he has lied and suggest that many key points of his statements remain unverified independently. Furthermore, they argue that Lessa is trying to protect another suspect involved in the case, raising questions about the integrity of his plea bargain. This dispute between the prosecution and defense reveals the contentious nature of the proceedings and the challenges faced in ensuring that justice is served effectively.

The emotional weight of the trial is palpable, especially for the family of Marielle Franco, who were present in the courtroom during these critical arguments. Accompanying them was Minister Anielle Franco, Marielle's sister, along with other political allies from the PSOL party. The justices' votes are expected to be read on the morning of October 25, concluding the penal action that has been watched closely by many in Brazil, who seek accountability in Franco's high-profile murder case and broader implications for political violence in the country.