Social networks should not be banned for minors under 16 years old
A growing global movement advocates for the restriction of social media access to individuals under 16, despite those in many countries currently being allowed access from age 13.
A nascent global movement has emerged advocating for the prohibition of social media access for individuals under the age of 16. Currently, the minimum age for most social media platforms is set at 13, but countries like Australia, France, Spain, and the United Kingdom are already implementing or considering escalated restrictions. This debate is beginning to resonate in other nations, including Argentina, emphasizing a rising concern about the impacts of social media on youth mental health.
Parents worldwide have voiced reasonable concerns regarding their children's emotional well-being in relation to social media use. Notably, evidence has surfaced indicating a correlation between social media use, particularly problematic use, and mental health issues including depression and anxiety. However, researchers caution against oversimplifying this relationship, noting that numerous overlapping factors, sometimes preceding social media engagement, complicate the direct cause-and-effect link.
A recent study from the University of Manchester highlights these complexities, involving 25,000 students aged 11 to 14 who were surveyed about their social media interactions. As this discourse and research advance, it raises significant questions about societal responsibilities, parental guidance, and the role of governmental regulations in managing the exposure of youths to potentially harmful digital environments, culminating in a broader dialogue on the necessity and implications of age restrictions in the digital age.