The Court of Justice of Minas Gerais acquitted a 35-year-old man accused of raping a 12-year-old girl, a decision that has stirred controversy due to its reliance on artificial intelligence. The presiding judge, Magid Nauef Láuar, included a command in the judicial ruling that asked an AI tool to improve the writing and reasoning behind a particular paragraph in the decision. This revelation has raised questions about the role of AI in the legal process and the implications it may have for justice and accountability.

The case became public knowledge through a report by the journalism unit of G1 and has since sparked discussions about the ethical use of AI in judicial decisions. The document in question spans 60 pages, with the AI-generated text appearing in one section, indicating a novel interaction between technology and traditional legal processes. Critics argue that incorporating AI in legal rulings could compromise the integrity of such decisions and undermine the gravity of the judicial process.

As technology continues to infiltrate various sectors, this case serves as a significant touchpoint for discussions on the implications of AI in law. It underscores the need for clear guidelines and ethical considerations when integrating AI tools into serious domains like justice. Given the sensitive nature of the crime involved, the combination of acquittal and AI usage adds to the public's concern regarding the protection of vulnerable victims and the overall functioning of the justice system.