The upcoming third round of talks in Geneva between the United States and Iran has created a tense environment, with officials from both nations underscoring the importance of diplomacy amidst increasing military readiness. US officials, including White House spokesperson Caroline Levitt, reiterated President Trump's preference for diplomacy but indicated a preparedness to use military force if necessary. Meanwhile, Iranian government spokesperson Fatemeh Mohajerani stated that while Iran prefers diplomatic solutions, it remains equipped for deterrence.

Compounding the situation, Iranian Revolutionary Guard ground forces announced military maneuvers off Iran's southern coast, signaling a potential show of force. On the US side, the Washington Post reported that the military has moved over 150 aircraft to bases in Europe and the Middle East following the conclusion of the second round of nuclear negotiations. This build-up is indicative of heightened tensions and the stakes involved in these negotiations, which aim to address concerns over Iran's nuclear program.

According to Zahra Kharazi, a professor of American studies at Tehran University, Iran has historically been open to negotiations and continues to present options amidst the ongoing crisis. The contrasting approaches of the two countries highlight the fragility of the diplomatic landscape and raise questions about the impact of military posturing on the talks ahead, underscoring the potential for either diplomatic resolution or increased confrontation.