Ecuador's Prosecutor Carlos Alarcón clarified that the ongoing investigations into the Triple A and Goleada cases are based on different criminal offenses, rejecting accusations of political persecution.
General Prosecutor Carlos Alarcón, addressing criticisms regarding potential overlaps in the Triple A and Goleada cases, affirmed that these are distinct investigations exploring different criminal offenses. The Triple A case is focused on the illegal trafficking and storage of hydrocarbons, both at the Ecuadorian border and in other cities, whereas the Goleada case involves organized crime associated with money laundering and tax evasion.
Alarcón emphasized that the legal frameworks for these cases address unique criminal activities. In the Triple A case, the charges revolve around the unauthorized handling of oil products, which is deemed a serious issue due to the implications for national security and economic regulations in the oil sector. This underscores the government’s commitment to combating illegal activities affecting the industry.
In contrast, the Goleada case represents a broader context of organized crime aimed at facilitating various illicit undertakings, including significant financial crimes. By clarifying these distinctions, Alarcón aims to reassure the public and critics that the investigations are being conducted based on evidence of unrelated and specific criminal offenses, thereby countering allegations of politically motivated actions against individuals involved in these cases.
