Feb 24 • 14:40 UTC 🇱🇻 Latvia LSM

Good and bad Soviet-era artists? Art scientist Elita Ansone on evaluating our heritage

Art scientist Elita Ansone discusses the complexities of evaluating Soviet-era art in Latvia, emphasizing the necessity of revisiting 20th-century artistic legacies.

Elita Ansone, an art scientist and curator, has made significant contributions to the contemporary evaluation of Latvian art stemming from the Soviet era. She has curated over 30 notable exhibitions and currently leads the Scientific Research Department at the Latvian National Museum of Art. Ansone's focus is on post-World War II art, particularly how it intersects with ideological and political issues, as well as its relevance in a modern context.

Her work highlights the necessity of critically revisiting the art from the second half of the 20th century to understand its impact and ongoing significance. This is particularly relevant in the current climate, as there is an increasing interest in re-evaluating how Soviet-era art has been perceived in Latvia amid changing cultural attitudes. The current exhibition dedicated to artist Ojārs Ābols at the Latvian National Museum of Art reflects this trend, showcasing dialogues around the absurdity of human experiences through art in that era.

Ansone advocates for a nuanced understanding of the cultural heritage left by the Soviet influence, emphasizing that both 'good' and 'bad' artists from that time contribute to a complex narrative about Latvian identity and artistic expression. This re-evaluation process is essential not only for historical context but also for informing contemporary artistic practices and discussions about national heritage.

📡 Similar Coverage