In a significant development concerning a school shooting case in Denmark, local authorities have announced the cessation of the investigation involving two minors. These individuals, who are below the age of criminal responsibility, were thought to have participated in the planning stages of a shooting incident at a school in Kolding. This decision follows the earlier announcement by the State Prosecutor in Viborg, where all charges against a 15-year-old boy, who had been detained since August 7, were dropped due to inadequate evidence for prosecuting any criminal acts.

The chief of the prosecution at the Southeast Jutland Police stated that for prosecution to be pursued, there must be clear evidence demonstrating the intention to commit a criminal act. In this case, the investigation determined that such evidence was absent, leading to the conclusion that the two underage suspects could not be prosecuted. This revelation has sparked conversations around the limitations and implications of Danish laws regarding minors and criminal conduct, especially in serious cases such as potential school shootings.

The 15-year-old boy, who has now been released from detention, has reportedly been advised to seek compensation for wrongful imprisonment. This incident raises important questions about the judicial process involving minors, public safety concerns, and the effectiveness of preventive measures against school-related violence. As authorities grapple with these issues, the case continues to highlight the challenges faced by law enforcement in handling youth-related criminal activities without adequate legal frameworks for prosecution.