Victims of the Adamuz train crash are expressing outrage over the alleged removal of materials from the accident site by Adif, the public railway company, prior to the conclusion of a judicial inspection. The spokesperson for the victims, Mario Samper, has claimed that there is a deliberate attempt to conceal evidence, as Adif staff took fragments of track and welding materials and relocated them without notifying either the court or law enforcement authorities. This unwarranted action has raised serious concerns about Adif's compliance with legal protocols surrounding evidence preservation in ongoing investigations.

Following the January 18 collision of the Alvia Madrid-Huelva and the Iryo Málaga-Madrid trains, the court in Montoro, which is investigating the accident, responded by formally requesting that Adif return the materials that were removed. This situation underscores the challenges faced by victims and their families as they seek justice and transparency in the wake of a tragic event that resulted in severe consequences. The organization that represents the victims is in the process of formalizing their collective stance against Adif's actions and is rallying for legal accountability.

The implications of this situation are significant, as it not only affects the ongoing investigation but also raises broader questions about the competency and ethical responsibilities of public transportation regulatory bodies. As the victims prepare to go to court, it becomes crucial to monitor how this issue evolves and whether it will lead to more stringent measures in evidence preservation and corporate transparency in Spain's public transport system.