The Finisterra case is under preliminary investigation for alleged money laundering, prompting political scrutiny after a report mentioned former presidential candidate Andrés Arauz of the Ciudadana Revolution party in chats associated with an international drug trafficking network. Among the claims is that an armored vehicle was allegedly made available to Arauz during the 2021 presidential campaign, as indicated in communications tied to Serbian national Jezdimir Srdan, also known as Brate, and his associates. To date, no formal connections have been established by authorities to back these claims, and Arauz has denied any involvement with illicit activities.

The emergence of these allegations has sparked significant political backlash from fellow lawmakers and local officials, who have expressed concern over the implications of such connections on the integrity of political figures in Ecuador. Given Arauz's prominent role in the political landscape, these accusations are particularly damaging and may influence public opinion and his support base. The political climate is becoming increasingly contentious as the government and opposition navigate the revelations of possible corruption and complicity.

Amidst the ongoing investigations, local authorities continue to monitor the situation, seeking to clarify the validity of the allegations while Arauz's camp maintains a firm stance of denial. As this case unfolds, it reflects the broader issues of corruption, accountability, and governance within Ecuador, raising questions about the rule of law and the mechanisms in place to address alleged criminal activities linked to political elites.