During the ongoing trial against Marius Borg Høiby, Haukland shared her emotional struggles and feelings of vulnerability as a public figure who has been identified as one of the victims. In her testimony, she expressed deep concern for her parents, reflecting the personal impact the legal case has had on her family. Despite her requests for anonymity in the media, she feels exposed due to her status and emphasizes the difficulties of being in the limelight during such a sensitive and painful process.

Haukland's statements shed light on the broader implications for public figures involved in legal disputes, where their identities and experiences are often thrust into the media spotlight. Her comments highlight the emotional toll this can take, not only on herself but also on her loved ones, as she navigates being both a victim and a public personality. The court's ruling against her plea for privacy raises questions about the balance between public interest and individual rights in legal circumstances.

This situation amplifies the conversation around victim rights, especially for those in the public eye, and the need for legal systems to consider the unique challenges these individuals face. Haukland's distress and sense of being unprotected showcase a critical perspective on how legal processes unfold for victims, emphasizing the importance of mental and emotional support for those participating in such cases.