Feb 24 • 11:03 UTC 🇸🇰 Slovakia Denník N

It is exhausting, conflicted, and has no results

The article critiques the Prime Minister's handling of the energy conflict with Ukraine, arguing that Slovakia's actions could be more damaging politically than economically.

The article, written by a former advisor to the Prime Minister of Slovakia, discusses the current energy conflict with Ukraine, particularly focusing on the Prime Minister's threat to cut electricity supplies. The author argues that Slovakia's position in this dispute is weak and suggests that such actions would harm Slovakia more than the intended target, as other countries would supply the needed electricity. This scenario could result in significant political fallout for Slovakia, overshadowing any potential economic gains from the conflict.

The author expresses concern that the Prime Minister's decision-making reflects a lack of understanding of international agreements and commercial law, especially given that the Slovak electricity network operator, SEPS, is a state-owned company. He emphasizes that the board members of SEPS have a legal obligation to manage their responsibilities with care, considering both the interests of the company and its shareholders. Poor decisions in this regard could expose them to personal liability for resulting damages, further complicating the political landscape.

Overall, the article highlights the complexity and potential ramifications of Slovakia's energy policies within the context of the ongoing conflict with Ukraine. It calls for a more strategic and less confrontational approach to ensure Slovakia's interests are safeguarded while also avoiding unnecessary political shame that could affect the nation's reputation beyond the tenure of current leadership.

📡 Similar Coverage