DAN GAINOR: Trump defeated the press like David smacked Goliath. Can they recover?
The article discusses how Donald Trump has managed to outmaneuver and undermine the traditional media during his political career, comparing his success to the biblical David and Goliath story.
The article, written by Dan Gainor for Fox News, explores Donald Trump's contentious relationship with the media over the past decade. Since he announced his candidacy for president, Trump has engaged in a battle with traditional news sources, asserting that he has emerged victorious in this conflict. Despite the media's attempts to hinder his political career, including multiple legal actions against prominent news networks, Trump has effectively demonstrated their waning influence on American society, a phenomenon likened to David defeating Goliath. Gainor argues that this victory further illustrates Trump's ability to shift the narrative and control the media discourse.
By highlighting Trump's success in legal battles and his unique approach to media engagement, the article suggests that the traditional press has struggled to maintain its authority in the face of Trump's populist appeal. Gainor points out that Trump's critics within the media once held significant power in shaping political narratives but have largely failed to prevent his ascendance within the American political landscape. The author posits that this dynamic is indicative of a broader shift in which the mainstream media's control over public perception is eroding, leading to questions about their future relevance.
Furthermore, the article raises concerns about the implications of this ongoing media struggle for the health of democracy in the United States. Gainor suggests that as Trump's influence continues to grow, the traditional media must reckon with its diminishing role and the potential consequences of that shift. The piece ultimately calls into question whether the establishment media can recover from its perceived failures and regain credibility in an age increasingly dominated by alternative information sources and evolving public sentiments towards news and politics.