The article discusses a controversial proposal by the Israeli government to amend a basic law that would eliminate judicial oversight of the Prime Minister's power to appoint or dismiss ministers. This move comes in response to concerns that the Supreme Court may challenge the continued tenure of Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. By proposing this law, the government aims to shield Ben Gvir and shift the balance of power, reducing checks on the Prime Minister’s authority.

This law, referred to as the 'Ben Gvir Law', is criticized for being a blatant attempt to establish authoritarian control under the guise of legality. The implications of this legislation could enable the Prime Minister to exercise unchecked discretion, reminiscent of practices in authoritarian regimes, where ministers may become increasingly dependent on the Prime Minister for their positions. This could potentially lead to governmental abuses of power and evade accountability in instances where the government fears unfavorable outcomes in court.

Overall, the proposal represents a significant shift in the dynamics of Israeli governance, potentially undermining the role of the judiciary as a check on executive power. As such, its passage could have far-reaching consequences for democratic practices in Israel as it suggests a reckless alteration of the rules during the game, effectively removing judicial oversight that has been a safeguard against executive excess.