Feb 23 • 21:55 UTC 🇪🇸 Spain El Mundo

The Plus Ultra lobbyist paid 110,000 euros a year to the Zapatero family for theoretical advisory and marketing services

A lobbyist for Plus Ultra has been found to have paid the Zapatero family 110,000 euros annually for advisory services amidst ongoing investigations into corruption and financial mismanagement.

In a significant development in Spanish political affairs, Julio Martínez Martínez, a lobbyist for the airline Plus Ultra, has reportedly paid an average of 110,000 euros annually to the Zapatero family for services supposedly related to consultancy and marketing. This revelation is pivotal as it emerges in the context of the Plus Ultra's financial struggles, with the company allegedly claiming a deficit of 48 million euros while engaging in these suspicious financial transactions. The payments to the Zapatero family have drawn scrutiny, especially as they coincide with the former president's involvement in the company's dealings.

The financial dealings came from a company named Análisis Relevante, established in 2020 with no employees, which Martínez used to funnel payments to the Zapatero family. Over a span of six years, the Zapatero family reportedly received around 460,000 euros, highlighting a potentially corrupt relationship between political figures and business interests in Spain. As investigations by the Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office continue, the implications of these findings could significantly impact the public perception of political figures involved, especially in light of the upcoming electoral campaigns.

This situation is compounded by the fact that the Partido Popular (PP) has summoned José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero to testify in front of the Senate’s 'Koldo commission'. This commission is investigating these financial dealings, which are emerging at a time of heightened political sensitivity and electoral campaigning in Castilla y León. The connection between Plus Ultra's financial mismanagement and the payments to the Zapatero family raises serious questions about accountability and transparency in political and corporate interactions, signaling a potential shift in the political landscape as these revelations unfold.

📡 Similar Coverage