Four years after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the question of peace has become an existential dilemma, not only for Kyiv but for Europe as well. There is ongoing debate about whether the end of the war is near or if this marks the beginning of a new phase of conflict. Experts are weighing in on the nature of any potential peace that could arise—whether it would be just, imposed, or merely a temporary pause before the next round of fighting. The article reflects on the complex dynamics of peace negotiations and the manifestations of military stasis on the ground.

As the dialogue about possible ceasefires takes center stage in international discussions, significant developments remain absent on the frontlines. The White House is engaging in talks about timelines, while the Kremlin continues to be active in negotiations without any substantial changes to the situation in Ukraine. This creates a perception that diplomatic processes and military realities are existing in parallel universes, causing concerns about the lack of genuine progress towards a resolution.

Moreover, the piece addresses broader implications of the conflict's resolution: Can the Ukrainian public accept territorial compromises? Is there a political desire from the Kremlin to end the conflict? These questions underline the complexities surrounding any potential peace agreement in the context of the ongoing war, highlighting the precariousness of the situation and the multiple layers of negotiation required to move forward in this crisis.