Donald Trump's forthcoming decision regarding airstrikes on Iran will be heavily influenced by the assessments of his special envoys, Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff. The administration is waiting for Iran to submit its latest proposal this week as negotiations are set for a crucial meeting in Geneva. These discussions are being characterized as a last-ditch effort to secure an agreement regarding Iran's nuclear program before any military actions may be considered. Trump’s decision remains pending as he evaluates the likelihood of a successful deal as advised by his envoys.

As part of the negotiation dynamics, Trump has expressed a willingness to consider limited airstrikes to exert pressure on Iran, should the talks not produce a favorable outcome. This could escalate to larger military operations aimed at regime change if all diplomatic avenues fail. The stakes are high, not only for U.S.-Iran relations but potentially for regional stability, as tensions have been exacerbated by Iran's nuclear ambitions. The positioning of Trump’s advisers suggests a strategic approach that weighs military action against the possibility of a diplomatic resolution.

This unfolding situation highlights the complexities within the Trump administration's foreign policy regarding Iran, emphasizing the significance of Kushner and Witkoff's roles in shaping not only the negotiation strategy but also possible military actions. The decisions made in the coming days may have far-reaching implications, potentially affecting global diplomacy and security. The reliance on personal advisors in such critical matters underscores the personalized nature of Trump's decision-making process, often sidelining traditional diplomatic channels in favor of close confidants' opinions.