In a recent meeting of the Executive Committee of the Liga Profesional, leaders from various Argentinian first division clubs unanimously voted to request the AFA (Argentine Football Association) to implement a strike across all categories of Argentinian football on March 5, 6, 7, and 8. This decision coincides with the ninth round of the Apertura Tournament and the scheduled interrogations of Claudio Tapia and Pablo Toviggino due to a corruption allegation put forth by the Agency of Revenue and Customs Control (ARCA). The accusations involve non-payment of taxes such as income tax, VAT, and social security contributions, amounting to a staggering 19.353 billion pesos.

Fabián Berlanga, president of Vélez Sarsfield, echoed the sentiments of the league's officials, suggesting that if necessary actions need to be taken, they will proceed. The feeling among the clubs is that a 'war against football' is being declared, hinging on the AFA’s alleged push to impose Sports Anonymous Societies, a move that has been met with clear opposition from the clubs' associations. The requested strike is indicative of the clubs' solidarity in protecting their governance against external pressures and allegations, positioning football as a cultural and national treasure rather than a mere business venture.

This pivotal moment raises important questions regarding the governance of football in Argentina and the role of the AFA. As clubs prepare to take decisive actions by potentially suspending matches, the implications stretch beyond immediate sporting events to the larger context of trust and integrity within Argentinian football. The outcome of this situation could significantly impact relations within the football community, and affect not only the individuals accused but also the broader structure of Argentinian football governance and its public perception.