The article examines the dilemma faced by many couples who choose to remain together for the sake of their children, despite being unhappy in their relationship. Family lawyer and co-parenting coach Gabriella Pomare highlights that people often find themselves in a difficult position where they feel obligated to maintain the family unit. The fear of change, worries about financial stability, and the emotional toll of co-parenting play significant roles in the decision to stay together. Moreover, the routines and shared responsibilities that come with raising children make the thought of separation daunting for many parents.

Pomare suggests that remaining in a "familiar discomfort" can seem less intimidating than the unknowns of separation, such as adjusting to a new living situation, handling child custody arrangements, and explaining the breakup to children and extended family. These factors contribute to a cycle where couples become entrenched in their relationships even if they are not functioning well. The notion of staying together for the sake of children often leads to discussions about managing day-to-day life in a way that minimizes disruption for the kids while addressing the emotional void felt by the partners.

Ultimately, the article raises the important question of whether remaining together is genuinely in the best interests of the children. While some may argue that a stable home environment is essential, others contend that a more authentic and happier co-parenting dynamic is preferable. The implications of this issue extend beyond individual families, suggesting a broader societal dialogue about the value of personal happiness and mental health in relationships, especially when children are involved.