Feb 23 • 17:34 UTC 🇸🇪 Sweden Aftonbladet

S criticizes proposal for stricter requirements for benefits

The Social Democrats criticize a proposal by the government and the Sweden Democrats that would require immigrants to live in Sweden for five years before receiving certain social benefits.

The Social Democrats (S) have voiced strong opposition to a recent proposal from the Swedish government and the Sweden Democrats (SD) that aims to implement stricter requirements for immigrants seeking social benefits. According to the proposal, immigrants must reside in Sweden for at least five years before they can access child support, housing allowance, parental leave, and sickness benefits. The party's spokesperson on social insurance issues, Ida Karkiainen, expressed concern that this policy could exacerbate child poverty and lead to an increased reliance on welfare support, particularly among families with lower incomes.

Karkiainen highlighted the potential inequalities arising from the proposal, which includes a provision for a fast track for immigrants with higher earnings to access welfare services sooner than those with lower wages. This aspect of the policy has raised alarms within the Social Democrats, who argue that it could create a divide between children of higher-earning immigrants, such as engineers, and those from lower-paid professions, such as care workers. They fear that such disparities could have long-term negative impacts on social cohesion and equity in access to essential services.

The criticism from the Social Democrats underscores the ongoing debate in Sweden regarding immigration, social welfare, and the nation's approach to integrating newcomers into society. As the government continues to consult on the proposal, the implications of these changes will likely be a significant topic in the lead-up to future elections, with parties positioning themselves on how to address the challenges associated with immigration and welfare support.

📡 Similar Coverage