Imran Masood has expressed his concerns regarding the blast that took place in Delhi, highlighting the numerous questions that have been raised in its aftermath. He pointed out the lack of clarity about which module might be responsible for the incident, noting that prior warnings had also indicated a possibility of such an attack. Despite these warnings, the unfortunate event still occurred, shedding light on the complexities of terror-related incidents in the region.

Masood emphasized the challenges faced by security agencies in defining who qualifies as a terrorist versus those who are innocent. He highlighted the alarming trend where individuals can spend decades in prison without clear evidence of guilt, only to be released later. This ambiguous situation complicates the efforts of security agencies striving to prevent future incidents, showing a pressing need for clarity in the definitions and legal frameworks surrounding terrorism.

The implications of Masood's comments extend beyond just the immediate incident; they call for a reassessment of how security measures are implemented and how individuals are classified in the context of terrorism. With increased scrutiny on both domestic security and the treatment of individuals within the justice system, there is an urgent need for new strategies that can ensure public safety without unjustly labeling innocent people as terrorists.