The article reflects on a recent proposal by the CDU in Schleswig-Holstein to revisit a sugar tax that failed at the national party conference. It underscores that while promoting reduced sugar consumption is a valid cause, the necessity of introducing another tax is questionable given the existing abundance of sugar-free and low-sugar alternatives available on the market. The author argues that public awareness regarding sugar consumption has already evolved, diminishing the justification for imposing a new tax.

Furthermore, the article questions whether the CDU, a party traditionally associated with values of freedom and responsibility, should advocate for taxation in a domain that affects consumer choices and health. While the importance of public health is acknowledged, the notion of the sugar tax is framed as potentially conflicting with democratic values. The CDU is urged to prioritize individual freedom, personal responsibility, and education rather than proposing increased regulation in this area.

In conclusion, the author positions sugar itself as not being inherently detrimental to democracy but rather suggests that the CDU must align its policies with the principles of liberty and informed choice. The implications of the CDU's actions could impact public trust and the party's ideological coherence, especially when navigating the balance between health initiatives and the freedom of choice in a democratic society.