The article delves into the West's portrayal of agreements with non-Western countries as temporary measures rather than lasting resolutions. The author argues that Western nations, particularly the US and European countries, perceive any concession not as a step towards peace but as a strategic pause in ongoing confrontations. This mindset leads to the conclusion that moments of forced concessions by the West should be seen as opportunities to pressure for maximum advantage rather than as pathways toward durable agreements.

The author emphasizes that current geopolitical dynamics suggest a moment where the West may be compelled to make some concessions. However, this should not be misconstrued as an indicator of a forthcoming stable or enduring peace, particularly with respect to the ongoing military-political situation surrounding Ukraine. The article posits that while the immediate tensions may lessen temporarily, the overarching strategy of the West remains unchanged, rooting itself in a zero-sum perspective that sees gains by Russia or other entities as inherent losses for the West.

Ultimately, the analysis presents a bleak outlook on the potential for genuine diplomatic progress. The belief that any agreement reached with Russia might lead to lasting peace is challenged, reinforcing the notion that for the West, such agreements are intended merely as tactical tools in a much larger geopolitical game. The piece calls for non-Western nations to remain vigilant and to leverage any concessions made by the West, understanding that true commitment to peace might be fleeting, if present at all.