In the latest development regarding former Prince Andrew, reports have emerged claiming he submitted questionable expenses during his tenure as the UK's trade envoy. Allegations surface that he billed massages as part of travel costs, raising concerns about the appropriateness of these charges. According to two former civil servants who spoke anonymously to the BBC, one official was reluctant to approve a reimbursement for massage services that Andrew had charged to travel expenses, while a second confirmed similar expense reports. This adds to the scrutiny on Andrew during a period in which the police are investigating his former residence.

As a trade envoy from 2001 to 2011, Andrew was expected to represent British interests abroad, but the allegations suggest a potential misuse of public funds, which could undermine confidence in the integrity of public officials. The fact that these claims have arisen amid an active investigation into his past also amplifies the spotlight on his actions during his time in a high-profile position. This situation raises important questions regarding the oversight of expense claims and the standards expected from government representatives.

The fallout from these allegations could have implications not only for Andrew's reputation but also for the broader public perception of the monarchy and its members. If proven true, these claims may lead to greater calls for accountability among public figures and a reassessment of the expense standards applied to envoys representing government interests. The ongoing investigation and revelations about Andrew's conduct continue to evoke mixed reactions from the public as the royal family navigates its role within a changing societal landscape.