The United States has recently convened another round of Western Sahara negotiations in Washington, engaging representatives from Morocco, Algeria, Mauritania, and the Polisario Front in an effort to address the longstanding conflict that has persisted for over fifty years. This meeting follows two previous talks held just weeks prior, indicating a concerted diplomatic effort, led by Donald Trump's envoy to Africa, Massad Boulos, aimed at reaching a resolution by spring. The US's active role reflects its interest in stabilizing the region, particularly with Morocco's involvement in wider geopolitical concerns such as Gaza stabilization.

During the talks, the central focus remains on Morocco's autonomy proposal as a foundational framework for discussions, in line with the UN Security Council's Resolution 2797 from October. However, the opposing parties, notably the Polisario Front and Algeria, remain firm in their demand for self-determination for the people of Western Sahara, creating significant friction in the negotiations. Analysts view these divergences as critical hurdles that must be overcome for the talks to advance meaningfully toward an agreement that addresses the core issues at stake.

Moreover, the negotiations are imbued with symbolic significance, as tensions not only highlight the differing political stances of Morocco and Algeria but also echo the broader implications of American foreign policy under the Trump administration. The push for a resolution in Western Sahara may also serve to bolster Trump's image as 'the peace president' while ensuring stable relations with Morocco, a trusted ally in the tumultuous landscape of North Africa. The outcome of these discussions may have far-reaching impacts beyond the immediate stakeholders, influencing regional dynamics and US foreign policy.