Association: The application of criminal liability to IT specialists without proven malicious intent threatens Latvia's digital development
The Latvian Open Technology Association argues that criminal liability for IT professionals in cybersecurity incidents, without proof of malicious intent or gross negligence, jeopardizes Latvia's digital advancement.
The Latvian Open Technology Association (LATA) has raised concerns that holding IT specialists such as administrators and programmers criminally liable for cybersecurity incidents, when there is no evidence of malicious intent or gross negligence, poses a significant risk to the development of Latvia as a digital state. This issue arises from the existing regulations in the Criminal Law, which they argue are vague and can lead to unjust consequences for professionals working in the IT sector.
LATA has expressed strong disapproval of the practice of pursuing criminal charges against IT staff involved in cybersecurity incidents when no malicious intent can be established. They contend that such legal actions not only threaten individual professionals but also stifle innovation and growth within the industry by creating a chilling effect that deters qualified individuals from remaining in or entering the field. The association emphasizes that this issue can undermine the overall confidence in Latvia's digital infrastructure.
The association points out that the current regulatory framework regarding criminal liability in the information and communication technology (ICT) sector lacks clarity, which can result in individuals facing severe consequences such as imprisonment for accidental errors made in managing IT systems. They urge lawmakers to revisit and reform these regulations to prevent the negative impacts on both individual professionals and the industry at large, highlighting the importance of maintaining a supportive environment for continued digital development in Latvia.