The article discusses a report by the Initiative Wild Carpathians that investigates local sentiments towards the proposed Turnicki National Park in Poland. Contrary to the binary opposition presented by some local opponents, the findings indicate that the views of the residents living around the park's planned boundaries are more nuanced. While there are significant concerns about the park, many local residents do not categorically oppose its creation; however, they express a desire for compromises that would protect their access to forest resources and ensure that the park is not established too close to their homes.

The report titled "Turnicki National Park – for people and for nature" suggests that introducing the park could create apprehensions among the local population, reflecting their fears about restrictions on forest access and timber usage. It highlights that any decision regarding the park's creation should consider the local community's needs and preferences. This understanding could lead to improved relations between conservation efforts and local livelihoods, ensuring that environmental protection does not come at the expense of residents' rights and needs.

Furthermore, the article points out that the concept of preserving parts of the Przemyśl Foothills has historical roots, suggesting that discussions around the park's establishment are not new. The report emphasizes the importance of community involvement in discussions about the park, aiming to find a balance that supports both nature conservation and the welfare of local residents. This approach could serve as a case study for similar conservation efforts in other regions, where local opposition might be mitigated through engagement and dialogue.