The article discusses the excitement surrounding the men's ice hockey final at the Olympics, specifically noting the thrilling moment when the victory was decided in overtime with a three-on-three scenario, emphasizing the high tempo of the game. Tatu Myllykoski, likely a commentator or analyst, expressed his exhilaration over the match, praising the quality of the players involved and lamenting the absence of lesser players disrupting the high-speed action. He called for more moments like this in the future.

In contrast, Kerttu Niskanen's performance in the skiing event is critiqued. Despite appearing not tired at the finish line, she lost out on a bronze medal due to the grip on her replacement skis, which were indicated to have been too much for conditions. The article suggests that even with better skis, her skiing did not seem to significantly outperform that of her competitors, raising doubts about her ability to break free from the pack on the course. This highlights the immense pressure athletes face at the Olympics, where any minor equipment issue can lead to missed opportunities.

Finally, the article comments on the international television direction of the event as less than effective, specifically noting a mishap during the coverage of the 50 km bronze medal race, where the focus was momentarily diverted to skier Ebba Andersson completing the course instead of the ongoing action. Such critiques underline the multifaceted nature of Olympic coverage, where not only the performances of athletes but also the presentation to global audiences plays a significant role in shaping the overall experience of the events.