The new Netflix docu-series 'Being Gordon Ramsay' has attracted attention for its portrayal of the celebrity chef's family life, with critics accusing it of being a 'sanitised' version that omits some less savory elements of Gordon Ramsay’s history. While the series focuses on his latest business venture, 22 Bishopgate, it touches on his challenging upbringing and his relationship with his abusive father, but leaves out darker chapters from his past, which has left some viewers feeling that the narrative is incomplete.

Key controversies surrounding Ramsay’s family, including prison sentences, allegations of betrayal, and affair claims have been left unexplored in the documentary. This has led to discussions about what constitutes an 'unflinchingly honest' representation of a public figure's life, and whether the selective storytelling does justice to the complexities of Ramsay's experiences. The critical reception indicates a division between those who appreciate Ramsay's culinary achievements and those seeking a more nuanced account of his personal life.

The absence of these incidents raises questions about the impact of narrative framing in biographical portrayals and the ways in which public figures manage their images. As Ramsay continues to hold a prominent position in the culinary world, the critique of his docu-series may influence how future projects about celebrity chefs and their real-life stories are produced, emphasizing the need for balanced and transparent storytelling.