As the war in Ukraine approaches its fifth anniversary, it prompts reflection on the narratives and myths that have emerged in relation to this extensive conflict. Michael Winiarski from Dagens Nyheter is addressing these misconceptions, particularly countering the argument that Ukraine is at fault for the war, which has been echoed by political figures like Donald Trump. The notion that Ukraine initiated the conflict ignores historical context and the realities of Russia's aggressive actions since 2014. Winiarski emphasizes that Ukraine was not in a position to choose war when Russia first invaded, as it lacked significant military resources at that time.

In his analysis, Winiarski also critiques the oversimplification of the peace process, arguing that calls for Ukraine to seek peace without addressing the underlying causes of the conflict fail to recognize the complexity and the ongoing humanitarian crisis. The commentary underscores the importance of accurately understanding the landscape of the war and the perceptions that shape public opinion. Winiarski's piece serves to educate readers on the actual dynamics at play and advocates for a more informed perspective regarding Ukraine's struggle for sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Ultimately, the article highlights critical narratives that influence international views of the conflict, suggesting that misconceptions could hinder effective support for Ukraine and a resolution to the war. As the conflict continues, the necessity of clear and truthful discourse around the circumstances of the war remains vital.